Pular para o conteúdo principal

What is good about Fashion?

Does fashion dictate rules for the way people might dress up? Sometimes, it can be good for some people. To other, it could be a huge problem and that creates a huge debate around the question: what is the most important, aesthetics or comfort?

To be "well-dressed", we know, may not be an easy task. In the ordinary notion, some people could say that you must be aware of the fashion world's tendencies. Likewise, that you need to have a good job, in which you earn a good money, since to be a stylish-looking person is not cheap.

On the other hand, there are many people who do not care about rules, tendencies, combining and other fashion world's features. Those people invent their own ways to dress up reusing, reinventing their clothes in order to save money and even more important, to avoid consumerism in excess.

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Must celebrities have a social responsibility?

There is a huge debate about celebrities' social responsibility. Worldwide many celebrities have been getting into political and social causes. In Brasil, for example, Gilberto Gil, Chico César, Fernanda Lima, Letícia Sabatela, Wagner Moura, Chico Buarque, Caetano Veloso are some of the well-known artists who support social, political and cultural movements. First of all, it's important to know that everyone has social responsibilities. Since we live in communities, being responsible for your fellow human being passes through thinking about education in a macro sight. Some people believe that celebs must be role models once they are famous. On the other hand, there are people who judge this discussion from different points of view. as social individuals, every person has rights. The question is: how has media been dealing with the privacy of those celebs? - what is the media role? - Somebody could argue that regardless of being a public figure they have the right to privacy. In

Produção textual para cadeira de literatura na faculdade

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARÁ CENTRO DE HUMANIDADES I TEORIA DA LITERATURA II PROFº: ATILIO BERGAMINI As principais ideias discutidas no livro "O clamor de Antígona" (2000), escrito por Judith Butler (1956), refletem sobre questões gênero, sobre as crises contemporâneas nas formas de parentesco e de representação política. Em seus argumentos e questionamentos, a autora dialoga com as reflexões de outros pensadores como Luce Irigaray (1930), Hegel (1770) e Jacques Lacan (1901), tendo como objeto comum de interpretação a tragédia Antígona (442 a.C.), escrita por Sófocles. Basicamente, o enredo da peça teatral gira em torno das ações de Antígona, uma das quatro descendentes do caso incestuoso de Édipo e Jocasta, sua mãe e esposa. As ações desenvolvidas pela protagonista tendem a contrariar as leis do Estado, ditadas pelo rei Creonte, que é também seu tio materno. O paradigma que se coloca é o de obedecer às leis do Estado e, inversamente, desobedecer às leis do parentesco ao en

Defining and non-defining relative clauses and participle clauses

Improving our speaking and writing has to do with how much we know about the language we speak. There is a good reason to study grammar deeper. The present essay intends to do a brief explanation of two interesting and very useful grammar topics: defining and non-defining relative clauses and participle clauses. First of all, we may distinguish when we use these two types of clauses: defining relative clauses are used when some information is important to specify what is being talked about. On the other hand, non-defining relative clauses are used when this information is not relevant or is only additional. An interesting characteristic is that this last one always uses commas. Relative clauses are sometimes referred to as adjective clauses. They are constructed by using relative pronouns such as "that", "which", "who", "whom", "whose" etc. in order to refer to people or things in a sentence. It is important to remember that we do not u